Xencoria

murderous LA pigs back on the street

posted 2013-05-16 20:57:32 by core

Six evil goons who beat a man to death are back on the street. Suprise, suprise. Unfortunately no brave freedom fighters have yet stepped forward to shoot these barbaric pigs.

Six Kern County sheriff's deputies and a sergeant, who last week were involved in a violent confrontation with a man who was struck numerous times with batons before he died, have returned to their regular jobs, officials said Tuesday.

David Sal Silva, 33, a father of four, was pronounced dead Wednesday less than an hour after eyewitnesses reported seeing several deputies repeatedly strike the man in the head with batons as he lay on the pavement.

Deputies had responded to a report of an intoxicated man. In addition to the deputies and sergeant, two California Highway Patrol officers were involved in the incident.

Raymond Pruitt, a Kern County Sheriff's Office spokesman, said the deputies and the sergeant present during the fatal incident last week "have been released to full duty."

The department has identified those involved as deputies Ryan Greer, Tanner Miller, Jeffrey Kelly, Luis Almanza, Brian Brock, David Stephens and Sgt. Douglas Sword.

Sheriff Donny Youngblood said a cause of death for Silva rests on toxicological tests, which could take from 90 to 120 days to be completed.

Youngblood cautioned in an interview Monday that it is too early in the investigation to reach any conclusions about Silva's death.

In an unusual move, sheriff's officials later detained for several hours two witnesses who had videotaped the incident on their phones. They were released only after they surrendered their phones to deputies.

Witnesses to the incident have described a violent scene, in which sheriff's deputies repeatedly struck Silva in the head with batons.

"I saw two sheriff's deputies on top of this guy, just beating him," eyewitness Ruben Ceballos said in an interview Monday. "He was screaming in pain ... asking for help. He was incapable of fighting back -- he was outnumbered, on the ground. They just beat him up."

One woman frantically called 911, telling the operator: "The guy was laying on the floor and eight sheriffs ran up and started beating him up with sticks. The man is dead laying right here, right now. I got it all on video camera and I'm sending it to the news. These cops have no reason to do this to this man."

The decision to take the witnesses' cellphones has raised further questions about the Kern County sheriff's handling of the incident.

"It makes it look like a cover-up," said David Cohn, a lawyer for Silva's children and parents, adding that he has not been able to see the footage. "What we're all concerned about is, `Are these videos going to be altered? Are they going to be deleted?' "

Youngblood defended the decision to take custody of the phones as a way of preserving possible evidence. The sheriff said his office obtained a search warrant for the phones.

"We still have to secure the evidence, especially when the evidence can tell us whether we did it right or wrong," Youngblood said.

He said his agency, to remove the appearance of any conflict, has asked the Bakersfield Police Department to analyze the phone videos.

KERO-TV Channel 23 in Bakersfield broadcast a security camera video from the scene showing grainy images of figures pummeling someone on the ground, with about 20 swings of what appear to be batons or sticks. It's difficult to see Silva in the seven-minute video or how many of those swings connected.

Silva stopped breathing and was taken to a hospital, where he was pronounced dead at 12:44 a.m. Wednesday, the sheriff's office said.

And so the body count continues to increase as pigs continue to get away with murder. Keep telling yourself they're only doing their job and killing bad guys -- one day they're going to show up on your doorstep. When they do, don't go down without a fight -- take some with you!

post a reply to this article

how history is made

posted 2013-05-15 21:25:02 by core

I was looking through some old books that somehow ended up at my parents' house. Among them, I found a set of history books from the 1930s. With an innate interest in the topic, I began reading them, and was absolutely shocked by what I found.

The last book of the series covered what were then modern times, and to my horror, I found lavish praise for -- of all people -- Benito Mussolini.

These were American books, by the way, beautifully produced by a respected publisher. And there, in authoritative tones, was the story of the great Mussolini, the savior of Italy. Given that I was taught precisely the opposite, a mere 30-odd years later, you can imagine my surprise.

Just to establish my point, here are a few quotes from that time about Mussolini:

"What a man! I have lost my heart!" -- Winston Churchill

"The greatest genius of the modern age." -- Thomas Edison

"I am much interested and deeply impressed by what he has accomplished and by his evidenced honest purpose of restoring Italy." -- Franklin Roosevelt

Obviously, these quotes are no longer mentioned in "respectable" circles. And that's my point: What is inconvenient to the current ruling establishment is dropped from the books.

When I was young, the USSR was famous for horribly twisting history to make themselves look like the great and mighty ones. They even made jokes about it on the original Star Trek. But here was clear evidence that history in America had been altered. In this case, parts had not been added, but they most certainly had been taken away. That rather shook my view of history, as it had been taught to me at school.

A few years later I came across an even more troubling instance of history being pulled out of the books.

I had been writing a few books for a major publisher, and one of my editors asked me to meet him for dinner, which, of course, I did. We discussed projects that we might pursue and generally had a pleasant evening. At some point we left off discussing our projects and talked about history. Somehow, we ended up at the Armenian genocide. He was surprised that I knew about it (many still don't), but I had known quite a few Armenian kids growing up, and I had heard their stories.

Then, my editor took a deep breath and said, "then I want to tell you something". He explained that a few years before, he had been working for one of the big three textbook publishers, and happened to be editing a high school history book. One day, he got a phone call from the US State Department. He was shocked, and asked them why they would be calling him.

"It's about the history book you're editing", the man said.

My friend had been raised in about the same way I had, so the idea of censoring a textbook was astonishing to him. "We need you to cut back the section on the Armenian genocide", the man from the State Department said. My friend was horrified, and complained that it was the true history. "Yes", said the man, "but we need to keep the Turks happy". So the 2-3 pages on the Armenian genocide was reduced to 2-3 paragraphs, and it was a victory that he got that much space.

According to all I learned in school, such things did not happen in America. According to all that is self-promoted about academia, they are the sworn enemies of such things. But they do happen. A lot.

I've encountered the same thing on museum walls: descriptions that are clearly misleading, but which glorify the rulership of our time.

There is much more to this, but I'll let the point stand as I've made it thus far: history is manipulated. You can find the truth if you dig through old books and artifact records, or from some specialists, but not from schoolbooks. The books aren't quite filled with lies, they just remove the facts that don't make their bosses look good.

And this is not a trivial thing; it affects a lot more than school children. What is deleted from history can teach us nothing, and those who have this power use it to glorify themselves. This is a very dangerous thing, and it rules the schoolbooks of America and the Western world in general.

What you learned in school was a partial, cartoon version of history. You learned what made the big bosses look good, and no more. So open your eyes, and use your brain. Throw away the "history" propoganda books, pull your kids out of the government's indoctrination programs, and smash the jew tube. Only then can you begin to truly understand the world around you.

post a reply to this article

Israelis develop artificial rat cerebellum

posted 2013-05-14 20:27:40 by core

Researchers at Tel Aviv University have devised an electronic chip capable of replacing the cerebellum in rats, a development that could lead to electronic brain implants that can replace damaged nerve tissue in humans.

The day when doctors can patch up the human brain with electronics, cyborg-style, hasn’t dawned just yet. But if the rats at Tel Aviv University are any indication, that day may not be so very far away. Researchers there have developed a synthetic cerebellum that has restored lost brain function in rats, demonstrating that artificial brain analogs can potentially replace parts of the brain that aren’t functioning properly.

The team’s synthetic cerebellum is more or less a simple microchip, but can receive sensory input from the brainstem, interpret that nerve input, and send the appropriate signal to a different region of the brainstem to initiate the appropriate movement. Right now it is only capable of dealing with the most basic stimuli/response sequence, but the very fact that researchers can do such a thing marks a pretty remarkable leap forward.

To achieve such a breakthrough, the cerebellum was a pretty ideal place to start. Its architecture is simple enough and one of its functions is to orchestrate motor movements in response to stimuli, making it easy enough to test. Using what they already knew about the way a rat’s cerebellum interacts with its brainstem to generate motion, they built a chip that mimicked that kind of neural processing and activity.

They then hooked up their chip to a rat whose cerebellum had been disabled (they did this externally, with the chip connected to the brain by electrodes--they did not implant the chip in the rat’s brain). Before hooking up their synthetic chip, they tried to teach the rat a behavior with its cerebellum switched off by combining an auditory tone with a puff of air to the rat’s eye that caused it to blink. The rat should’ve quickly learned to blink its eye at the stimulus of the tone alone without the puff of air (think Pavlov), but with its cerebellum disabled it could not.

The team then switched on the synthetic cerebellum chip. Soon enough, the rat learned to blink at the sound of the tone as a normal rat would. Their chip proved a sufficient stand-in for the rat’s own neural tissue.

This is a simple stimulus-response, but it’s also huge in terms of what it means for our understanding of how to manipulate the brain. The system would clearly have to be scaled way up for human use, which is not expected any time in the foreseeable future. But it does swing the door wide open for future synthetic implants that could replace nervous tissue damaged by injury, stroke, or age-related degradation.

post a reply to this article

the wonders of multiculturalism in Sweden

posted 2013-05-13 21:19:03 by core

The country that gave us Bergman, ABBA and Volvo could become known as the Bosnia of northern Europe.

The "Swedish model" would no longer refer to a stable and peaceful state with an advanced economy, but to a Eurabian horror story of utopian multiculturalism, socialist mismanagement and runaway immigration. Some thought I was exaggerating, and that talk of the possibility of a future civil war in Sweden was pure paranoia. Was it? In a new sociological survey entitled "Vi krigar mot svenskarna" ("We're waging a war against the Swedes"), young immigrants in the troubled city of Malmo have been interviewed about why they are involved in crime.

Although it is not stated, most of the immigrant perpetrators are Muslims. In one of the rare instances where the Swedish media actually revealed the truth, the newspaper Aftonbladet reported several years ago that 9 out of 10 of the most criminal ethnic groups in Sweden came from Muslim countries.

This must be borne in mind whilst reading the following newspaper article: Immigrants are "waging war" against Swedes through robbery. The wave of robberies the city of Malmö has witnessed during this past year is part of a "war against the Swedes." This is the explanation given by young robbers from immigrant backgrounds when questioned about why they only rob native Swedes, in interviews with Petra Åkesson for her thesis in sociology. "I read a report about young robbers in Stockholm and Malmo and wanted to know why they rob other youths. It usually does not involve a lot of money," she says. She interviewed boys between 15 and 17 years old, both individually and in groups.

Almost 901364253640f all robberies reported to the police were committed by gangs, not individuals. "When we are in the city and robbing we are waging a war, waging a war against the Swedes." This argument was repeated several times. "Power for me means that the Swedes shall look at me, lie down on the ground and kiss my feet." The boys explain, laughingly, that "there is a thrilling sensation in your body when you're robbing, you feel satisfied and happy, it feels as if you've succeeded, it simply feels good." "It's so easy to rob Swedes, so easy." "We rob every single day, as often as we want to, whenever we want to." The immigrant youth regard the Swedes as stupid and cowardly: "The Swedes don't do anything, they just give us the stuff. They're so wimpy." The young robbers do not plan their crimes: "No, we just see some Swedes that look rich or have nice mobile phones and then we rob them."

Why do they hate the Swedes so much? "Well, they hate us," Petra Akesson reports them as answering. "When a Swede goes shopping, the lady behind the counter gives him the money back into his hand, looks into his eyes and laughs. When we go shopping, she puts the money on the counter and looks the other way." Åkesson, who is adopted from Sri Lanka and hence does not look like a native Swede, says it was not difficult to get the boys to talk about their crimes. Rather they were bragging about who had committed the most robberies. Malin Åkerström,a professor in sociology, sees only one solution to the problem: "Jobs for everybody. If this entails a deregulation of the labor market to create more jobs, then we should do so."

It is interesting to note that these Muslim immigrants state quite openly that they are involved in a "war," and see participation in crime and harassment of the native population as such. This is completely in line with what I have posited before. The number of rape charges in Sweden has quadrupled in just above twenty years. Rape cases involving children under the age of 15 are six times as common today as they were a generation ago. Most other kinds of violent crime have rapidly increased, too. Instability is spreading to most urban and suburban areas. Resident aliens from Algeria, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia dominate the group of rape suspects. Lawyer Ann Christine Hjelm found that 85 per cent of the convicted rapists were born on foreign soil or from foreign parents. The phenomenon is not restricted to Sweden. The number of rapes committed by Muslim immigrants in Western nations is so extremely high that it is difficult to view these rapes as merely random acts of individuals. It resembles warfare. This is happening in most Western European countries, as well as in other non muslim countries such as India. European jails are filling up with Muslims imprisoned for robberies and all kinds of violent crimes, and Muslims bomb European civilians. One can see the mainstream media are struggling to make sense of all of this. That is because they cannot, or do not want to, see the obvious: this is exactly how an invading army would behave: rape, pillage and bombing. If many of the Muslim immigrants see themselves as conquerors in a war, it all makes perfect sense.

Malmo in Sweden, set to become the first Scandinavian city with a Muslim majority within a decade or two, has nine times as many reported robberies per capita as Copenhagen, Denmark. Yet the number one priority for the political class in Sweden during this year's national election campaign seems to be demonizing neighboring Denmark for "xenophobia" and a "brutal" debate about Muslim immigration. During last years Jihad riots in France, Sweden's Social Democratic Prime Minister Göran Persson criticised the way the French government handled the unrest in the country. "It feels like a very hard and confrontational approach." Persson also rejected the idea of more local police as a "first step" in Sweden. "I don't believe that's the way we would choose in Sweden. To start sending out signals about strengthening the police is to break with the political line we have chosen to follow," he said. Meanwhile, as their authorities have largely abandoned their third largest city to creeping anarchy, there is open talk among the native Swedes still remaining in Malmö of forming vigilante groups armed with baseball bats out of concern for their children's safety. As I argued in another essay: If Arnold Schwarzenegger fails to get re-elected as Governor of California he may like to do a sequel to "Conan the Barbarian." He could shoot it in Malmo. He will get the extras for free.

What happened to the Swedish nanny state, you say? Don't Swedes pay the highest tax rates in the world? Yes, they do. But tens of billions of kroner, some say several hundred billions, are being spent every year on propping up rapidly growing communities of Muslim immigrants. Sweden has become the entire world's welfare office, because the political elites have decided that massive Muslim immigration is "good for the economy." Soon Sweden's "army" may comprise no more than 5,000 men, five thousand troops to defend a nation more than three times the area of England. Moreover, it may take up to a year to assemble all of them, provided they are not on peacekeeping missions abroad. That Sweden might soon need a little peacekeeping at home seems to escape the establishment. In 2006 the celebrated Swedish welfare state has become the world's largest pyramid scheme, an Enron with a national flag.

Although Sweden is an extreme example, similar stories could be told about much of Western Europe. As Mark Steyn points out, the Jihad in the streets of France looked like the early skirmishes of an impending Eurabian civil war, brought on by massive Muslim immigration and Multicultural stupidity. Law and order is slowly breaking down in major and even minor cities across the European continent, and the streets are ruled by aggressive gangs of Muslim youngsters. At the same time, Europeans are paying some of the highest taxes in the world. We should remind our authorities that the most important task of the state - some would even claim it should be the only task of the state - is to uphold the rule of law in exchange for taxation. Since it is becoming pretty obvious that this is no longer the case in Eurabia, we should question whether these taxes are still legitimate, or whether they are simply disguised Jizya paid in the form of welfare to Muslims and our new Eurocrat aristocracy. Although not exactly the Boston Tea Party, perhaps the time has now come for a pan-European tax rebellion: We will no longer pay taxes until our authorities restore law and order and close the borders to Muslim immigration.

This is urgent. When enough people feel that the system is no longer working and that the social contract has been breached, the entire fabric of democratic society could unravel. What happens when the welfare state system breaks down, and there is no longer enough money to "grease" the increasing tensions between immigrants and native Europeans? And what happens when people discover that their own leaders, through the EU networks and the Euro-Arab Dialogue described by Bat Ye'or in her book "Eurabia," have been encouraging all these Muslims to settle here in the first place? There will be massive unemployment, and tens of millions of people will feel angry, scared and humiliated, betrayed by the system, by society and by their own "democratic" leaders.

post a reply to this article

how we got 0wnt by the evil banksters

posted 2013-05-11 00:09:06 by core

Would you like to know how we all got 0wnt by the evil banksters?

Meet Nathaniel Rothschild, who said :

"He who owns the money supply owns the people."

Banking began as a sleight-of-hand, when gold dealers with vaults realized they could issue receipts (IOUs) for much more gold than they actually had on deposit. This is the origin of currency. Then they got the State to borrow and guarantee their fraudulent IOUs which became the money supply.

The human race has been enslaved by these sociopaths, who now use bogus terrorism as a pretext to protect their credit monopoly and collect their bogus debt and interest.

Money is a medium of exchange, like a coupon. It has no intrinsic value but is essential for economic vitality. The bankers control the corporations that control the politicians and mass media. They ensure humanity is diverted and depleted by bogus wars and depressions while they erect their "world government".

Using Gentile fronts, Jewish bankers succeeded in privatizing the money supply and making it a liability of the State. (This is like controlling the oxygen supply.) Money is just a medium of exchange, like a coupon. It has no intrinsic value. They have bought everyone and everything worth owning, beginning with politicians and mass media, and ensured that humanity is diverted and depleted by constant wars and depressions.

In November of 1688 the Catholic king of England James II (Stuart) was overthrown through a well-organized invasion financed by the moneyed Jews of Amsterdam and led by the Prieure de Sion and the Orange Order.

The king was exiled to France and in February of 1689 William of Orange, the prince of Nassau, was put upon the English throne. This became known as the "Glorious Revolution". Even official historians admit that the people did not participate in this coup.

England was in poor condition after 50 years of war with France and the Netherlands. William III asked several powerful bankers for help. They provided the English state with a loan of 1.25 million pounds but only delivered 750,000 pounds. The terms of the loan were as follows; the names of the lenders were not to be revealed, and these were guaranteed the right to found the Bank of England, whose directors were able to issue loans to a value of 10 pounds for each pound of deposited gold in the bank vault. They also were allowed to consolidate the national debt and secure payment for annuity and interest through direct Taxation of the people.

The privately owned Bank of England was established in 1694 with absolute control over the currency (the right to issue bank notes). The lending of money on usury continued at an even larger scale. Thus the English people suffered a huge national debt. Taxes had to be raised and prices doubled. To the Masonic bankers it was necessary to have a monopoly on money issuing. That way they were able to make enormous profits and also control political processes.

The Bank of England was allowed to lend money to an amount 10 times the security the lender put up. With 5 percent interest it only took two years for the bank to earn back an amount equal to the original security.

By the year 1698, the national debt had risen from one and a quarter million pounds to 16 million. In 1815 it was 885 million pounds and in 1945 it had grown to 22.5 billion pounds. By 1995 the national debt had risen to more than 300 billion pounds, equal to 45 percent of GNP.

Not even the Macmillan Committee, which was appointed in 1929, managed to find out who governed the Bank of England. Only one name has leaked out - that of Rothschild. All great wars have been started and financed by the economic conglomerate emanating from one single banking family - the Rothschilds.

In the Netherlands, secret societies had been able to found a central bank as early as 1609. About 40 of the world's most important central banks were established in a similar way as that of the Bank of England. In that way the Masonic bankers ruled the long-term development in the world with loan interest as a method, the central banks as middlemen, the politicians as dummies and the people as ignorant wage slaves.

The Freemason-controlled banks thus can govern political life by acting without being seen. The English people strengthened the power of these invisible Freemasons through paying taxes during three centuries. Central banks were supposed to keep the economy stable. In reality it works quite differently.

Benjamin Franklin wrote of the British colonies in North America in the 1750s: "Nowhere on Earth does one find a happier and more well-being people". He explained that this was due to that "we in the colonies make our own currency, called colonial scrip". He further explained: "By issuing our own currency we can control its buying power, and we are not obliged to pay interest to anyone."

In these British colonies in New England, there was a wealth contrasting sharply to the poverty and misery in England. There was enough money, and it was definitely interest free.

When the Masonic bankers in England heard Franklinâ€™s speech to the British Parliament, they made sure that Parliament forbade the colonies from using their own financial system. The money supply was reduced in half, and the colonies were forced to borrow money from the Bank of England. The result was steep interest and price increases. Within a year the streets were full of unemployed people.

In American schoolbooks, the reason given for the outbreak of the Revolutionary War was the tea tax, but according to Franklin "the colonies would gladly have borne the little tax (of 2 percent) on tea and other matters had it not been that England took away their money which created unemployment and dissatisfaction". The result of the influence of the English banks on the British Parliament was horrendous poverty in America. When this situation had been created, it was easy to get people ready for war which the Freemasons did with satisfaction. They wanted a safe base for their future global activities.

Among the men who drew up the Constitution of 1787, many urged protection against the financial drain of the international bankers. Therefore Article 1, Sec. 8 of the Constitution reads: "Congress shall have power to to coin money, regulate the value thereof."

Alexander Hamilton, a Freemason and secretary of finance in the government of George Washington, and also the agent of the international financiers, ordered the establishment of a privately owned union bank and the introduction of interest money. His argument was simple; " limited national debt would he a blessing to a nation". He considered it dangerous for the government to issue its own currency.

Thus the United States got its first central bank in 1791. It was privately owned but had a contract running for only 20 years. It was not renewed when it expired. Andrew Jackson referred to the fact that the Constitution had given Congress the right to issue currency in sufficient quantity but not transfer this right to others.

The Freemason Nathan Rothschild (1777-1836), who partly financed the Napoleonic wars through the Bank of England, subsequently issued an ultimatum -- either the contract be renewed or there would be war. Jackson called the Masonic bankers a bunch of thieves and promised to exterminate them. Rothschild gave his own orders: "Teach those insolent Americans a lesson. Force them back to a colonial status".

The British government began to limit the American sea trade and checked the American expansion in Canada. President James Madison let Congress declare war on England. Rothschild's intention was to lay waste the country so that the Americans would be forced to seek financial aid. Great Britain, however, failed to regain the lost colonies, and the United States failed to occupy Canada.

Rothschild did not triumph this time. The renewed central bank contract was again suspended in 1836 during Andrew Jackson'ss presidency (1829-1837), despite the fact that he was Grand Master of Tennessee. The central bank was temporarily abolished.

Even so European bankers and their American agents managed to exercise an extensive control of the American monetary system. Gustavus Myers admits in his book /History of the Great American Fortunes/ (1910): "Under the surface, the Rothschilds had a direct influence by dictating the American financial laws. The legal records show that they were the ones in control of the old Bank of the United Slates".

In American history books there is nothing about the role of the banks in the first and second American wars of independence (that is 1775-83 and 1812-1814).

The power to create money rightfully belongs to the people themselves.

Treating money as a commodity that is monopolized and kept rare by a cabal of foreign bankers is not just stupid but monstrous.

Every day someone dies for lack of funds. Infrastructure crumbles because, "we don't have enough money". Things we need are not built because they are "too expensive".

And that's how the banksters 0wnt us.

post a reply to this article

suspicious facts emerging about Boston bombing

posted 2013-04-19 21:53:28 by core

The Boston Marathon bombing has provoked shock, grief and outrage from around the world. After decades of conditioning, the public automatically equates such terrorism with Muslim radicals. But the evidence shows that every major terror plot on American soil in the past 10 years has been fostered, funded and equipped by one organization: the FBI.

We're now being told that the responsible parties for the Boston bombing have been identified. Can it possibly be that, for once, we have some actual terrorists on our hands instead of the usual quasi-government actors?

Forgive us for being skeptical, but we aren't buying it. First it was "right-wing extremests", then a "Saudi National", then some other kid, and now these two Russian guys.

Information continues to surface about security contractors, bomb-sniffing dogs, suspicious persons on the roof-tops, pre-planned bomb operations and guys wearing combat boots and black back-packs.

The FBI and the Department of Homeland Security are releasing few details after a shootout at MIT, but it has been reported that this may be in relation to the Boston bombings and that one suspect is in custody.

The grey Honda CRV has been located by the Cambridge Police. The plate # is 316 ES9. The entire city remains a ghost town as the Governor told all Boston residents to remain inside. All police scanners in the area have been taken down, likely as a terror protocol.

The shooting lead to a car jacking, in which the shooter fled to Watertown mass. It was here that a large shoot out began between police and suspects.

The scene was horrid, being described as on par with a small battle, allegedly containing several explosions, other unexploded devices may have been found as well. Federal agents and DHS were on the scene, leading many to believe in a connection between the shootings and the horrific scene on Monday. Police refuse to comment on the matter, so for now, we speculate.

CBS even says that there were explosions on the scene, and that one police officer was killed in the shootout.

An MIT Police officer has apparently died after he was shot near the Stata Center on campus Thursday night. A pursuit and shootout in Watertown early Friday morning may be connected to the shooting. The Middlesex DA's office says the officer was responding to a report of a disturbance in the area of Vassar and Main streets when he was shot multiple times. A witness says he heard explosions and gunshots before the suspect was taken into custody. WBZ-TV's Lauren Leamanczyk reports that the National Guard is at the crime scene in Watertown.

It's now becoming clear that members of the Boston bomb squad had advance notice of the horrific bombing that took place at the marathon.

As an eyewitness reports, once the bombs went off, officials began announcing, "this is just a drill!" This logically means they were all informed of the "bomb drill" beforehand. Otherwise, why would they respond with, "this is just a drill"?

According to Local15TV.com, a University of Mobile's Cross Country Coach said there were bomb-sniffing dogs at both the start and finish lines, long before any explosions went off.

He said:

"They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about. It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill."

The official story of the bombing is that terrorists detonated two bombs at the marathon finish line and that the Boston bomb squad magically located a third bomb one mile away, identified the bomb, rigged it with explosives and initiated a "controlled explosion" all in less than an hour.

Here are some of the facts we know so far :

Bomb-sniffing dogs were present at the start of the race and the finish line, even before bombs went off.

The reported arrest of a "Saudi national" has now been retracted. Apparently that was a mistake published by the NY Post.

Instead, the mainstream media is pushing a new narrative that blames "right-wing extremists" for the bombing, even without a shred of evidence to back that up.

It is impossible for a bomb squad to have located, analyzed, rigged and detonated the third bomb in under an hour, especially when it was located one mile away, at the Kennedy Presidential Library.

Given these facts, ask yourself: Who is the most likely culprit in the bombing?

The Boston bomb squad clearly had advance notice of the presence of the bombs at the marathon, and they also had advance notice of the location of the bomb at the Kennedy Presidential Library.

There are two reasonable explanations for this:

Someone called in a warning and threatened to bomb the event, which is why the bomb squad was on scene.

The bomb squad carried out the bombing as a false flag operation to achieve a political goal (unleashing TSA on the streets, blaming right wingers, increasing the bomb squad budget, etc.).

For explanation number one: If a credible threat had been called in, why didn't the Boston police cancel the marathon or try to warn runners about the security threat? Is it their policy to allow people to jog right into a massacre they've already been warned about?

For the second explanation, there are all sorts of reasons why the Boston bomb squad might have placed the bombs at the marathon. It could have been a drill that went terribly wrong (i.e. no explosions were planned but they accidentally went off), or it could have been a deliberate attempt to terrorize the American people and justify armed TSA agents on the streets for all future sporting events.

This looks more and more like a planned event to justify a TSA lockdown.

Although it's still a bit early to know for certain, this looks more and more like a planned event that was deployed by the Boston bomb squad, called a "drill," then used as a pretext for the President to call for TSA agents to be on the streets at all future sporting events.

And that, in turn, is the run-up to the TSA occupation of America, which has always been the goal of Obama. Remember that back on the campaign trail, he announced he wanted to build a "civilian national security force."

Obama says: "We've gotta have a civilian national security force that's just a powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded..."

The fastest way to build a domestic national security force is to stage domestic bombings as a pretext. More and more, that seems to be what unfolded in Boston. Remember, too, that DHS has now purchased over 2 billion rounds of ammunition to be used domestically, against the American people.

The real proof is in what happens next.

Regardless of what you might think is behind this right now, the real proof will be found in what Obama calls for in response to the bombings. If he calls for TSA on the streets of America to "keep everybody safe" at sporting events, then it's all clearly a false flag rolled out for a political purpose. It was all a pretext to justify a TSA lockdown.

If the bombing is used to frame and blame veterans, patriots or "right-wing extremists," then it's clearly a false flag, too. Veterans and patriots have been severely demonized by the Obama administration as well as the leftist media.

If the administration avoids using the bombings to roll out its political agenda, then it might have legitimately been a random terrorist attack by a deranged individual. We'll have to wait and see what Obama calls for in reaction to the attacks in order to know their true political purpose.

Xencoria will continue monitoring the situation.

post a reply to this article

Madonna and her nigglets on Oprah

posted 2013-04-17 20:42:33 by core

post a reply to this article

the InformationAmerica data mine

posted 2013-04-15 22:37:24 by core

The importance of Information America and many systems systems like it isn't what it can do for you; rather, what can be done with it to you! As Xencorians, we take whatever measures neccessary to make sure our personal information isn't sucked into these databases. You should, too!

"Whether you are conducting a background check, looking for a witness, skip tracing, or gathering information for court, [the system] gives you a quick, easy method for gathering information on individuals across the country... at the touch of a key."

Information America (IA) is now called KnowX (LexisNexis); it provides a single service whose databases cross-index the Postal Service's National Change of Address file (NCOA), major publisher and direct marketing companies' client information, birth records, driver's license records, phone books, voter registrations, various governmental records, and more. IA boasts that over 111 million names, 80 million households and 61 million telephone numbers are maintained (as reasonably up-to-date as possible) on-line.

INFORMATION AMERICA NETWORK                                
 
      I N F O R M A T I O N   A M E R I C A   B E G I N N I N G   M E N U 
 
                  CORPORATE, UCC, & RELATED RECORDS 
                   1. Corporate Global (CGL) 
                   2. Corporate & Limited Partnership Records (COR) 
                   3. State & County UCCs, Liens & Judgments (ULJ) 
                   4. State UCC & Lien Filings (UCC) 
 
 5. Sleuth (SL)                          6. Litigation Prep (LP) 
 
NATIONWIDE SERVICES                    COUNTY & COURT RECORDS 
 7. People Finder (PF)                  15. County Records (COU) 
 8. Executive Affiliation (EA)          16. Bankruptcy Records (BNK) 
 9. Business Finder (BF)                17. Lawsuits (LS) 
10. Business News (BN)                  18. Real Property Asset Locator (RP) 
11. SEC Filings (SEC)                   19. Real Prop, Liens & Judgments (RLJ) 
12. Duns Business Records Plus (DB) 
13. Name Availability/Reservation (NAR) 75. Help Line (HL) 
14. Document Ordering eXpress (DOX)     99. Exit the System (OFF) 
 
Enter the menu number or abbreviation of your choice:

Of the three categories, options under NATIONWIDE SERVICES are the most interesting. Information America is easy to use, completely menu-driven and features extensive on-line Help.

The power of People Finder lies not only in its ability to tap various large store-houses of data, but in its flexibility of search criteria. People Finder is made up of four services: SKIP TRACER, TELEPHONE TRACKER, PERSON LOCATOR, and PEOPLE FINDER MULTITRACK. Depending on the information available, a People Finder profile may include current address, telephone number, residence type, length of residence, gender, date of birth, up to four household members and their dates of birth and a neighbor listing.

SKIP TRACER traces a person's moves or verifies the current address when all you have is an old address. You will enter the person's name, street number, street name, and either the Zip Code or city/state. If your subject is in IA's files, a profile will display that includes the address he moved to (or current address), phone number, length of residence, and more. You may also request a list of 10 of the person's neighbors. A profile on the current resident at your subject's old address and up to 10 neighbors there may also be available. This gives you several contacts to help you find your subject.

TELEPHONE TRACKER tracks down the owner of a telephone number. You must enter the phone number and either the area code or the city/state. If a match is found, you may look at a profile of that individual/residence and a listing of up to 10 neighbors.

PERSON LOCATOR helps you locate a person when specific address information is unavailable. Enter the person's name and indicate whether you wish to conduct a search by city, state(s), zip or nationwide* PERSON LOCATOR will compile a list of names (up to 300 names for nationwide and up to 100 names for individual state searches) that match the information entered. When you find the right name, you may request a profile and neighbor listing for that individual.

PEOPLE FINDER MULTITRACK helps you locate multiple people during one search. Search results are available the following business day. For each of your subjects, enter the name and indicate the geographic area you wish to search -- nationwide*, multi state, state, city or zip. You may enter up to 25 names per search. Sign off the system and let Information America do the work for you. The following business day, log on to Information America and access the People Finder Menu by entering PF at the Information America Beginning Menu. From the People Finder Menu, you may view the results of People Finder MultiTrack by entering RR (Review People Finder MultiTrack).

REVIEW PEOPLE FINDER MULTITRACK allows you to review the status of each of the searches you requested. You may choose to view the results of each completed search at this time. Search results will be stored for seven days from the day you requested the search. You may review the search results at any time during the seven-day time period through the Review People Finder MultiTrack option. Search results include a summary listing of names that match the information entered (up to 300 names for nationwide and up to 100 names for individual state searches). From the summary, you may select individual profiles and neighbor listings.

 
INFORMATION AMERICA NETWORK 
 
                          P E O P L E    F I N D E R 
           Client Billing Code: 123456 
 
    1. Person Locator (PL)           (Search by name & location) 
    2. Skip Tracer (ST)              (Search by name & last known address) 
    3. Telephone Tracker (TT)        (Search by telephone number) 
    4. People Finder MultiTrack (PX) (Multiple searches by name & location 
                                      with results available next business day) 
    5. Review People Finder MultiTrack Results (RR) 
 
                    70. Revise Client Billing Code  (BC) 
                    75. Help Screen  (?) 
                    92. View Common Names (VC) 
                    95. Description of Service  (DES) 
                    99. Go to Beginning Menu  (BEG) 
                    OFF Exit off the System  (OFF) 
 
Last Name:   public                     First Name:   jane 
Enter City or ZIP code. 
City: ANYTOWN                           ZIP Code: 90210 
 
Searching... 
 
 INFORMATION AMERICA NETWORK--PEOPLE FINDER 
 Name Searched: PUBLIC JANE 
 
                                PERSON LOCATOR 
                               Last Name Summary 
 
 No.  First Name       Street               City/State      ZIP   Phone No. 
 --- ------------ ----------------------  ---------------- ----- ------------ 
   1 JANE         27 AVENIDA AVE          ANYTOWN       CA 90210 213-727-8023 
*  2 JOHN         69 CALLE DE LOS PUTOS   ANYTOWN       CA 90211 213-000-0000 
 
* PUBLIC JANE has been found as an additional household member. 
 
Searching... 
 
 INFORMATION AMERICA NETWORK--PEOPLE FINDER  -  Detail 
 Name Searched: PUBLIC JANE 
 
                             PERSON LOCATOR 
                            Resident Profile 
 
                        Name: JANE PUBLIC 
                     Address: 27 AVENIDA AVE 
                              ANYTOWN, CA 90210 
   Approximate Date of Birth: 10/66 
                      Gender: FEMALE 
         Length of Residence: 3 YEARS 
              Residence Type: SINGLE 
 
                    **** Additional Household Names **** 
                    Name       Approximate Date of Birth 
                    MICHAEL              04/68 
 
Searching... 
 
 INFORMATION AMERICA NETWORK--PEOPLE FINDER  -  Detail 
 Name Searched: PUBLIC JANE 
 
                               PERSON LOCATOR 
                              Neighbor Listing 
 
        Resident: JANE PUBLIC 
         Address: 27 AVENIDA AVE 
                  ANYTOWN, CA 90210 
                                                                 Residence 
       Name               Phone#           Address            Length(yrs)/Type 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
WILLIAM PRESTON       (818) 727-8125  12 BOGUS AVE               12 SINGLE 
THEODORE LOGAN        (818) 725-8643  17 BOGUS AVE               04 DOUBLE 
KRIS APPLEGATE        (818) 685-2112  19 BOGUS AVE               03 TRIPLE 
MARTIN MCFLY          (818) 727-0353  26 BOGUS AVE               23 SINGLE 
STAN CISNEROS         (818) 727-4973  30 BOGUS AVE               16 SINGLE 
LUCY BYRNE            (818) 727-8765  33 BOGUS AVE               10 SINGLE 
JONATHAN DEPP         (818) 725-2012  35 BOGUS AVE               06 SINGLE

IA is only as accurate as public records reflect. People who move frequently or move from apartment to apartment (students, for instance) are either not likely to be found in IA, or the information IA provides is likely to be out-dated. In one search we performed, IA concluded that our subject had lived at his residence for 3 years when, in fact, the subject had been living there for over 15 years.

Unlisted telephone numbers are frequently available through IA if, for example, your subject's unlisted number has appeared in a City Directory. Curiously, information seems to be disappearing from IA, in some cases. Searches on other individuals which once listed their unlisted telephone numbers now yield "000-0000". We have no explanation for why this seems to have happened.

As with most systems, IA passwords are often easy to guess. Initial passwords, which are assigned when an account is first created, are usually composed of the account holder's first name, or first name plus a middle or last initial. In some cases, the password is made up of the digits in the username plus the first name of the account holder. In other cases, the password is two random letters plus a two-digit number (ex: PG13). If users are ever encouraged to change their password from its initial value, they rarely seem to do so.

IA's clients are mostly lawyers and paralegals working at legal firms, but the FBI is also a major IA client. Television programs in the 60s and 70s which depicted an FBI "Big Brother" computer system scared the public enough so that it and the Congress have continually resisted efforts by the FBI to implement such a system. In the mid 80s, for example, Congress voted against the implementation of an FBI computer system which would allow them to monitor telephone calls. Information America is the perfect solution for the FBI's bureaucratic quandary.

We take for granted the existence of government-run databases which contain even more detailed information on Americans than IA possesses. Even so, those databases are considerably smaller, and what's more, they're well-regulated: the agencies that run them accountable by Law. The potential for abuse by a system like Information America -- devoid of any checks and balances -- is spectacular. The same technology advances which were supposed to make at-home shopping a convenience and tailor marketing to your needs have now made surveilling you cost-effective, accurate and as easy as touching a key.

There are three national credit reporting companies which oversee all local and regional credit bureaus. These bureaus each are owned or report to only to Equifax, Trans Union, or TRW. Where a person has lived and what kind of credit they establish or use affects which credit bureau(s) tracks individual accounts and payment histories. An account paid late or an account paid on time will not necessarily appear on all three reports. Or, often, not even on two reports. Mortgages, for example, are commonly listed in the reports of only one national credit company. Sometime mortgage payment information appears on none of the three "brands" of credit report histories. It depends on whether or not the mortgage company reports the information and to whom it is reported.

A single credit history report provides only a window on a consumer's credit history. Sometimes that window is fully opened, but more commonly it is partially closed. Sometimes it's even completely obscured.

The long and short of this is that NO SINGLE CREDIT REPORT, NOT EVEN ALL THREE CREDIT REPORTS WILL NECESSARILY REPORT AN INDIVIDUAL'S TOTAL CREDIT EXPERIENCE. In fact, a person could theoretically have a bad report from one national company, a good report from another, and no credit history with the third. It happens. The younger the individual, the more likely this is to be true.

Even if your credit is good, you need to know if there are errors, who has been inquiring about your credit, and if the identity information reported about you is accurate. While, statistically, the incidence of erroneous information is low (and getting lower), mistakes in your credit history file can cost you more than just a credit disapproval now and then. There's also the growing incidence of identity theft which credit companies are having more and more trouble dealing with or preventing.

If you don't want to be screwed by systems like this, it's time to privatize your personal information, now!

post a reply to this article

avoid becoming an actor in the legal circus

posted 2013-04-13 20:46:54 by core

No "Policy Enforcement" / "Revenue Collection" officer ("Police") has the power to "Arrest" you. They can only "apprehend" and "detain" you for up to two (2) hours, - during which time they must take you before a "Court Officer" for "probable Cause" Hearing. it is the Commissioner/ Judge/ magistrate's job to determine whether the government has sufficient evidence to "charge" or prosecute you. it is at the "Court Officer's Office", that the detainment is converted to an actual "Arrest".

In order to become a "Party" to a Law suit or "Case",- government must "trick" you (within the first 48 hours after "Arrest" at the "court commissioner's"/ Justice of Peace's/ Judge's Office) [See Riverside vs. McLaughlin ], into making "Appearance". By making "Appearance", - you become "a party" to the case as "Defendant".

The several "tricks" are:

(1). You must give them your Name. Until YOU voluntarily state your Name, - they must write the fictitious name "John Doe" on their papers. Even if they already know you. Even if they have found a "Driver License" with the ALL CAPITAL LETTER fictitious name duplicate to yours, - they can not make the tie-in. They have to trick YOU into stating your name to them, or They must trick you, where:

(2.)You must agree to post a "Bail-Bond", or,

(3.)You "sign" something (Signature = "Consent to be regulated") or

(4.)You must agree to accept an "Attorney" to "Represent" you, or

(5.)You must enter a Plea of "Not Guilty" or "Guilty", or

(6.)You discuss, address or mention any facts about the case, or

(7.)You must say or write something (anything) favorable to your position or un-Favorable to the Plaintiff's position, (traverse).

(8). You say or write anything admitting that there is a "case". [The presumption being - if it is not Your "case", Why would you even acknowledge it ?] By acknowledging that there even is a "case", - you must be a "Party" to that case - you just made an "Appearance". According to C.J.S.(California Jural Society) the only way to defeat being tricked into making "Appearance", is to challenge "In Personam" jurisdiction, and NOTHING ELSE. The (geographical) physical location "Venue" jurisdiction, and "subject matter" "In Rem" (contract in commerce) jurisdiction of the Court, arise by "Operation of Law". (Case entry)

If they "Arrest" you and "Take you in" - DON'T EVER give your name. To do so, is to voluntarily enter into a "Contract " with the court - and You have made an "Appearance" in the "Case". Exercise your "Miranda" "Right to remain silent" and DON'T SIGN ANYTHING (No Bond papers, No "Finger Print Card", No."Photograph Card", No "Personal effects" voucher, etc.), where they only have 48 Hours to hold you, and trick you into "Appearance", or Release you (See Riverside vs. McLaughlin- Calif.).

Also, - If they "Arrest" you, - have a Friend (after the 49th Hour) serve the "Riverside vs. McLaughlin Law Suit" on the Plaintiff "STATE OF of I and District Prosecuting Attorney, and the "Keepers" at the jail (or wherever they are holding you). They will contact their "Lawyer" to ask about it. He will advise them to let you out, immediately, rather than face additional damages from the "Law Suit".

When in the Court, - When they ask you a question, ANY question - Don't say Anything. Don't give, write, or say your Name. When they say, - "What's your name?" Say "I am not 'authorized' to sign anything." When they ask you a question, (such as "What's Your Name?"), say "I don't have enough information or knowledge to form a responsive answer" or "I Object" or "I don't Understand." (To "understand"- is to "stand" "under"; be subordinate; be "subject" to.)

John Doe- A fictitious name frequently used to indicate a person for the purpose of argument or illustration. or in the course of enforcing a fiction in the law. The name which was usually given to the fictitious lessee of the plaintiff in the mixed action of ejectment. He was sometimes called "Goodtitle." So the Romans had their fictitious personages In law proceedings. as Titus, Seius.

The name "John Doe" Is, and for some centuries has been. used In legal proceedings as a fictitious name to designate a party until his real name can be ascertained. State v. Rossignol. 22 Wash.2d 19. 153 P.2d 882. 885. When they demand "payment" of a"debt" in Court. We say "Will you accept a non-redeemable Note drawn on a Private Bank?". They say "No". We show a $ Federal Reserve "Note" to the Judge, and We say "Your Honor, they just refused "Payment" - per U.C.C. 3- 603 1 (b) Debt is discharged'. He says 'You're right- Case Dismissed"

Statement to make before a "fiction court" "Under"- 1.) in or to a position below or beneath something. 3.) in or into a condition of subjection, subordination, or unconsciousness.

"Standing" - n. lb: a position from which one may assert or enforce legal rights and duties.

"Understanding" - n. 3c: a mutual agreement not formally entered into but in some degree binding on each side. "Understanding" - adj. 1: fully apprehended.

"Apprehend" - 1a: to take hold of. 1b: arrest, seize. 3: to grasp with the understanding; be fully aware of vi i understand, grasp.

"Fiction" - 1a: something invented by the imagination or feigned.

"Feign"-la: to represent by a false appearance of. Pretense, dissemble.

"Dissemble" 1: to hide under false appearance. 2: to put under the appearance of: simulate - vi: to put on a false appearance, conceal facts, intentions, of feelings under some pretense.

"Statement - before a fictitious court", "I Do Not understand as to feign or dissemble, or to be so understood as to be fully apprehended, for to do so would be under false pretense, therefore, I Do Not have understanding"

SECOND STATEMENT (follow-up) if necessary. "I Do NOT understand, for I may be beneath a position from which YOU may assert your legal rights, and may create an agreement not formally entered into, but in some degree binding, and this may cause me to be falsely understood, fully apprehended, and dissembled, therefore, I Do NOT have understanding"

Fiction of law. An assumption or supposition of law that something which Is or may be false Is true, or that a state of facts exists which has never really taken place. An assumption. for purposes of justice, of a fact that does not or may not exist. A rule of law which assumes as true. and will not allow to be disproved something which is false, but not impossible. Ryan v. Motor Credit Co.. 30 N.I.Eq. 531. 23 A 2d 607, 621 In their "Fiction" Court Their "discretion" is YOU LOSE - regardless how much "Proof" or evidence of how "Right" you are.

If summonsed to court, to avoid being arrested by authority of a bench warrant for failure to appear, remain behind the fence between the visitor's gallery and the plaintiff's/defendant's area.

If you go in that area, you are in the jurisdiction of the judge, who sits in admiralty/statutory jurisdiction. There is no judge sitting on a bench in a common law court. If a judge is invited into a common law court, he/she sits at a level playing field table. The bench represents the bridge of a ship - above the main deck where the crewmembers would assemble for discipline from the captain.

When they call your name, or what appears to represent your name, ask: I believe I have received this summons by mistake. May I see the court papers regarding this case so that I may determine that it is I you wish to have answer to the charge so specified on this summons I was served?

The judge will try to bully you into stepping into the defendants area, and will continue to ask you whether you are (name). Keep saying: I don't know until I see the court documents with the name of the person charged. I cannot step into the defendant's area until I know that; because, if I were to do that I may be committing a fraud on the court, and I don't wish to do that. Would you please have the clerk or the bailiff bring me the court papers so that I may view them?

Hold your ground. You are not in the judge's jurisdiction until you proceed through the gate.

If they do bring you the papers, you will find that the name is in all capital letters or written in a military style, last name first, etc.

State, this isn't me. When asked who you are, state: Your full name and spell it out: capital (letter) lower case (remaining letters), hyphen, capital letter, remaining lower case, full colon, space, capital letter remaining lower case.

Since legal fiction names must be written in capital letters, in a military fashion, or without proper punctuation, they cannot write your name properly, but must use trickery in getting you to acknowledge by tacit consent that you are also the legal fiction AKA they have unlawfully assigned to you. You must protest against this loudly.

Suppose your name is John Paul Jones. When the clerk calls your name, stand up and stay in the visitor's seats, and ask: Does the Court have the affidavit of John Paul Jones?

If the answer is "no", ask the clerk to come and get a copy from you (stay in the visitor's seating area).

If the answer is "yes", ask: Has the judge read the affidavit? If "no", ask him/her to read it please. Then, proceed with the following:

Roger Elvik, an expert on common law procedure uses this technique if he is to be forced into the judge's jurisdiction.

Question #1: (To the judge) What is your name? You are listening for his/her common law name. Do not accept something like "Judge Jones". Point out the fact that his statement is an office, not a name. If you can get him/her to answer (if not, proceed to #4);

Question #2: Do you have a cause of action against me? He/she will have to say "no".

Question #3: Do you know any other man present here who has a cause of action against me? He/she will again have to say "no"; or, repeat the summary jurisdiction fictional character who may represent the Crown, etc.; however that does not constitute anyone who can bring a cause of action against a living man, according to Sections 20, 24, 38 and 39 of the Magna Carta. "R. vs Hess" (BC Court of Appeals 1949) recognizes Magna Carta as being part of the Canadian Constitution.

#4: "I request the order of this court." You are asking for the authority to convene a court action against you. Things should lawfully stop there; however, if something is muttered, state: "Since there is no lawful order for this court, I demand to be released immediately. I believe there has been malicious mischief and acts of public nuisance committed against me."

Attempt to leave. If you do not attempt to leave, a judge may be able to assume that you are staying within his administrative/admiralty jurisdiction.

Note: "Public Nuisance" seems to be one complaint where "sovereign immunity" cannot be used by judges and other government officials to protect themselves from prosecution for malicious mischief. The Common Law deals ONLY with a thinking and responsible mind. A man's putting on a mask, a cloak or a badge does not alleviate him/her from being responsible for obeying the law - the Common Law -"Do not unto others what you would not have them do to you."

Section 19 of the Canadian Criminal Code says: "Ignorance of the law is no excuse in the commission of a criminal offense."

Officious arrogance and assumed superior authority are also not an excuse for violating the law - violating the Absolute Rights of a man.

A civil suit should be filed immediately in Queen's Bench/ Superior Court level against all judges, Crown Attorneys, CCRA agents and police involved in the action against you.

post a reply to this article

XPL0R

IntelAgent

Total Immersion

ASIA

BIZARRE

CANADA

DRUGS

EXPLOITS

FOOD

HARDWARE

JEWS

LAW

MONEY

N.W.O

NIGGERS

PAKIS

PIGS

PRIVACY

SURVIVAL

TECHNOLOGY

U.S.A

WHITE POWER

0wnt : dude takes over police domain name

murderous LA pigs back on the street

how history is made

Israelis develop artificial rat cerebellum

the wonders of multiculturalism in Sweden

how we got 0wnt by the evil banksters

suspicious facts emerging about Boston bombing

Madonna and her nigglets on Oprah

the InformationAmerica data mine

avoid becoming an actor in the legal circus